Mobile Prices | Nokia Mobiles

SIT findings ensure Narendra Modi can’t shake off riot taint


 
  Newest Topics Replies

 ° Indian forthcoming movies
87
 ° Bait bazi shairy
16
 ° Indian movies release dates
61
 ° Lets play antakshri
23
 ° Sing a song according to your own mood
41
 ° Virat kohli profile & biography
7
 ° Fill the blank^_^
35
 ° Sachin tendulkar profile & biography
12
 ° Watch ipl live streaming
22
 ° Piyush chawla profile & biography
4
 ° Ravichandran ashwin profile & biography
2
 ° Sl vs ind live score board
7
 ° Munaf patel profile & biography
3
 ° Say good (morning, night, afternoon)
40
 ° Praveen kumar profile & biography
4
 ° Yusuf pathan profile & biography
5
 ° India vs sri lanka match results
3
 ° Virender sehwag profile & biography
4
 ° Ms dhoni profile & biography
9
 ° Zaheer khan profile & biography
11
 ° Harbhajan singh profile & biography
3
 ° Yuvraj singh profile & biography
9
 ° Suresh raina profile & biography
3
 ° Gautam gambhir profile & biography
4
 ° Daily highlights of common wealth games cwg 2010
2
 ° 4 oct 2010 daily schedule updates common wealth games 2010
1
 ° What's your dream career?
5
 ° What is link sculpting ?
0
 


Read and share current affairs and issues, political and local affairs.
Share Bookmark and Share

SIT findings ensure Narendra Modi can’t shake off riot taint

Postby fiza on Fri Feb 04, 2011 5:49 am

NEW DELHI: In a serious blow to Narendra Modi's reputation as an able administrator, the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigation Team (SIT) has indicted him on over a dozen counts for his alleged complicity in the Gujarat riots of 2002.

The confidential report of the SIT, which has been reproduced extensively by Tehelka magazine, has upheld much of the complaint lodged against Modi and his administration by Zakia Jafri, widow of former Congress MP Ahsan Jafri who had been killed during the riots.

The SIT submitted its 600-page report to the Supreme Court in May 2010 after it had, among other things, questioned Modi for 10 hours. Its damaging observations against Modi are despite the SIT's admission that several witnesses had declined to testify for what was merely a preliminary enquiry and not a criminal investigation under the law.

Key findings of the inquiry done by former CBI officer A K Malhotra under the supervision of SIT chairman K Raghavan are as follows:

* "The chief minister had tried to water down the seriousness of the situation at Gulbarg Society, Naroda Patia and other places by saying that every action has an equal and opposite reaction," Malhotra reported. "His implied justification of the killings of innocent members of the minority community, read together with an absence of a strong condemnation of the violence that followed Godhra, suggest a partisan stance at a critical juncture when the state had been badly disturbed by communal violence." Raghavan added that Modi's statements were "sweeping and offensive coming as it did from a chief minister, that too at a critical time when Hindu-Muslim tempers were running high."

* The report said that Modi's 'controversial' move to place two senior ministers — Ashok Bhatt and I K Jadeja — in the Ahmedabad city police control room and the Gujarat state police control room during the riots with "no definite charter" fuelled the speculation that they "had been placed to interfere in police work and give wrongful decisions to the field officers."

* The report affirmed that police officers who took a neutral stand during the riots and prevented massacres had been transferred by the Gujarat government to insignificant postings in a highly 'questionable' manner.

* "The Gujarat government has reportedly destroyed the police wireless communication of the period pertaining to the riots," SIT said, adding, "'No records, documentations or minutes of the crucial law and order meetings held by the government during the riots had been preserved."

* The report said Modi displayed a "discriminatory attitude by not visiting the riot-affected areas in Ahmedabad where a large number of Muslims were killed, though he went to Godhra on the same day, travelling almost 300km on a single day."

* According to the report, the Gujarat government did not take any steps to stop the illegal bandh called by the Vishwa Hindu Parishad on February 28, 2002. On the contrary the BJP had also supported the bandh.

* The SIT report also pointed out that the police administration did not impose curfew in Naroda and Meghani Nagar (Ahmedabad city) until 12 and 2pm respectively on 28.02.02 although the situation had by then severely deteriorated at both those places.

* The SIT discovered that the state police had carried out shoddy investigations in the Naroda Patia and Gulbarg Society massacre cases and deliberately overlooked the cellphone records of Sangh Parivar members and BJP leaders involved in the riots.

* The SIT has also found evidence against the then minister of state for home Gordhan Zadafia (who was reporting directly to Modi) and top police officers such as M K Tandon and P B Gondia for their alleged complicity in the riots.

* SIT confirmed that the government appointed VHP and RSS-affiliated advocates as public prosecutors in sensitive riot cases. The report states: "It appears that the political affiliation of the advocates did weigh with the government for the appointment of public prosecutors."
fiza
 
Posts: 1126
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:09 am

Return to Current Affairs

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests